There are thousands of theories about what the unconscious mind is and can do. Some believe that it is the “soul” of the person, and is unique to we humans. It separates us from the “lower” animals on this planet. Others believe further that it makes us unique in the universe, but in my opinion (IMO), that 's just our ego.
The plain and simple truth is that no one knows, and few even suspect the awesome power of the unconscious. We do know that it can “cure” a person, or “kill” that same person in different circumstances. We know that it may be affected by life experiences, hypnosis, and/or subliminal repetition. We also know that traumatic life events can cause future problems, even seemingly unrelated problems, including allergies! Why and how is just a part of what we don't know.
We also know that as the mind thinks, it emits signals generated by different neurons in the brain moving around as we think and act. Different frequencies are involved in certain areas, and most of these are in the audible range. This movement has been called “A Symphony in the Brain” and there's even a book with that title, about this “brain orchestra”.
The composite of all these constantly changing brain wave “notes” is always present, although this “orchestra” of different notes and waves of notes composes the full spectrum of what we call “audible sound”. These notes that make up these waves are so very weak that it takes expensive equipment to amplify such brain waves enough so that we can use them in EEG Biofeedback (AKA Neurofeedback), The raising of one band of such frequencies (SMR - 12-14 Hz), and the lowering of another (Theta - 4-8 Hz) is used in EEG BF and in the Bate Auditory Training system. Both systems are very effective in solving most of the “brain problems”.
As a sidelight to these brain waves, we also know that they only begin in human babies around the 24th to 26th week of pregnancy. Up to that time, there are no brain waves present. This is the general argument against 3rd trimester abortion. This theory has the soul entering that infant body making it a “human being” at that point, and up to then, it is simply an animal body, and not a human life. This theory has one fallacy. Animals show brain waves at appropriate times in their gestation, so perhaps, this has nothing to do with the “soul”.
Scientists have labeled this entity as the “unconscious” or “subconscious”, but this part of the mind is neither of these things. We have labeled this part of the mind according to our ego and for our convenience. It would be better named “superconscious”, as this part of our mind is the real “control” of what we are; what we do (and not do); how we react to various stimuli of living, etc. Our ego makes us think our conscious mind is in control of our actions, but that's simply not true. Our conscious mind is constantly controlled by our unconscious.
There are many theories about this “soul” part of the unconscious. The one I like is from Jung. It theorizes a “universal” mind, perhaps the mind of all of earth, or even of earth itself. All these minds are one conglomerated entity in effect, composed of all the (unconscious) minds that exist now or have ever existed. Perhaps this “universal mind” is another name for God, or Nature, or whatever - a force that is mostly unknowable by we humans. (I wonder why this is?)
The evidence of supernatural “powers”, and “abilities” of some “gifted persons” is simply overwhelming. What is called miracle(s) may be only another different manifestation of this universal mind. Thomas Sugrue, the author of the well-written biography of Edgar Cayce, named his book, “There is a River”. There is no question that Cayce was able to “tap into” this river of unconscious knowledge, even though he didn't understand how he did it, how it worked, and most of the knowledge he received while in “trance”. But, in over 20,000 writings of medical diagnosis, he was never proven wrong. That's impressive.
There have been many prophets over time that accurately foretold the future besides Cayce. Nostradamos and many others, biblical and secular have done what may be called miracles by lesser folk. (Hypnosis was a “miracle” to me. An automobile or airplane or TV would be a miracle to primitive persons.)
A lot of hardheaded scientific folk tend to scoff at all such “anecdotal” evidence, and refuse to even look as anything that they cannot verify by sight, feel, hearing, or by effect on something else.
But, even with the hardheads, evidence is piling up that's hard to ignore. In the fields of EEG Biofeedback Training and Auditory Training, we now know that by changing the amplitudes of certain brain waves, large changes in several aspects of some person's lives and personalities are also changed. A huge amount of research over the past 35 years has shown clearly that this simple therapy can solve many of the “brain problems” such as the ADD-Autism continuum, depression in all forms, insomnia, epilepsy, addictions and even schizophrenia.
The Autonomic Nervous System
If we accept the concept of a “universal mind”, then we have to look at two parts of this mind:
A computer part (called the Autonomous Nervous System or ANS). This system controls the “housekeeping” functions automatically.
The “universal mind” (soul?) part that is in some type of communication with that universe (whatever or wherever it may be).
(Could Freud have been on the right track? Are there three parts to the mind, with limited or poor communication between them?)
If we look at the computer (ANS) part, we find that the analogy is pretty good. If a computer virus gets in, it can screw up normal programs. If a bad “ideation” gets into the human computer mind part, it can also screw up normal programs. If we get garbage in as data, then we get garbage out as behavior.
Most people think that computers are smart, but the plain fact is that all computers are very dumb. They only do exactly what we tell them to do, and if we program them wrong, we get wrong answers. (We could wish that they would always do what we want instead of what we actually ask, but that would undoubtedly be even more frustrating.)
There has to be a definite separation between the computer (ANS) part of the unconscious mind and the Universal mind. And we have to add to both of these “entities” the factor of INDIVIDUALITY. This is a concept that many MD's don't fully understand. They are trained to get height and weight, and prescribe according to “volume” of the patient. This “gross” measure, which does not take into account individuality, is often wrong.
Let's consider the programming of the computer (ANS) first. There is a genetic component, which varies the basic program accordingly. Then, there is a “learned” component, which provides several other variables. All this “data” combined determines your health in dozens of ways. How much of a particular nutrient you, as an individual require, how a deficiency of any kind will affect you as an individual. What your immune responses will be. How it is, and how it will be, what diseases you are liable to get, etc.
The Orthomolecular Theory of Sickness has 3 conditions necessary for sickness or poor health.
NUTRITIONALLY DEFICIENT OR TOXIC. (Our modern diet leaves all of us somewhat nutritionally deficient, and many persons are toxic due to environmental pollution).
STRESS. (In our world, who doesn't have stress. The caveman only had a few real emotional stresses. We face saber-toothed tigers every day.)
PREDISPOSITION. (What is your family history, and what has your unconscious mind (ANS) learned as you've gone thru life?)
This theory made sense to me the first time I heard of it. If the body chemistry (nutrition) isn't correct, the immune system can't work right. If there is stress present, then the body needs even more good nutrition to handle it. (A downward spiral in effect - stress causing more deficiency, and more deficiency causing more symptoms/illness causing even more stress.)
The particular illness that may affect you from this stress is determined by the predisposition. One person gets chronic headaches, another gets heart problems, and another gets cancer. Life is a big crap game with loaded dice.
So, to become an Orthomolecular clinician, I found that I had to learn about nutrition down to the chemical and biological level. I also had to become an “expert” in allergy, and sensitivity, as this is a huge factor in stress. I found myself in the early 80's reading from 3-6 books a week, with another 3-6 on order from libraries around the country. There are still few to no schools or universities devoted to this new science, and what nutrition is taught is often poor to wrong.
“Nutritionists” and “dieticians” are still being taught that the basic four food groups are “good” nutrition in many schools. (A meal at McDonalds can be “good” by this measure!) MD's get at most one hour on nutrition (with very little time on vitamins and minerals and other supplements) compared to thousands of hours on pharmacology (drug use). Few psychologists know (or care) anything about allergy/sensitivity, thus cannot deal effectively with any of the more serious brain problems of ADD/ADHD, Autism, insomnia, epilepsy, depression and schizophrenia.
Both MD's and PhD's are “educationally handicapped”. At least half of what they learned in school is at least partially false, but they are “programmed” to follow it because of their education. Oh well, it was the same in the Middle Ages, and even recently (in history), any doctor who didn't bleed his patients was called a quack. Looking at the history of medicine, you'll find that; virtually all-major advances in medical science were done by a doctor who was called a quack by his contemporaries. I'm proud to have been called a quack. I'm in excellent company!
An alternate theory to the above is that the ANS is simply the “computer part” of the universal mind that handles the “housekeeping” for the body. This theory is supported by the interactions between these two entities. Both affect each other's functioning it would seem. Bad ideation in the universal mind certainly may create havoc in the immune system and the body.
Extra Sensory Perception
In the 1930's Dr Joseph Banks Rhine, a psychologist at Duke University set up a set of experiments designed to prove that “mental telepathy” didn't exist. To his surprise (and horror), he found that not only did mental telepathy exist, but so did clairvoyance, and all the other “impossible” psychic phenomena. He named these as a group - Extra Sensory Perception (ESP). He also invented the Rhine cards for ESP testing.
In 1973, I did a lot of experiments with Rhine cards, and I found that hypnosis definitely could improve ESP ability in some persons. I was shocked to read that Rhine had done several experiments that clearly showed hypnosis did NOT increase ESP ability. How can this disparity be?
In 1974, I had a lovely dinner with Joe and his wife Louise, and spent the night as a guest. After dinner and well into the night, Joe and I argued. Neither of us could credit the other's data, yet we both credited each other's beliefs, so to speak. We argued many other subjects, and I know that I learned from him, and hope that he learned from me as well.
In 1979, I wrote my doctoral dissertation. My thesis was on hypnotic phenomena of course. During the research, I was somewhat surprised to find such disparity in actual experimentation results. Experimenter A did experiment A, and got results A. Experimenter B did experiment A, but got results B. This happened over and over in the literature and history of hypnosis. How can this be? After documenting so many of such differences, I finally realized - In hypnosis, the experimenter is always part of the experiment.
I postulated two conditions (both of which are pretty well accepted as fact):
Most hypnotized persons are “desperately eager” to please the hypnotist, a father figure of sorts. This is why a good subject will do stupid, even abnormal things when asked.
The unconscious communication between the experimenter and the subject allows the subject to (at least sometimes) “know” what outcome is “desired” by the experimenter.
Both Joe and I were working with good hypnotic subjects, and these were also above average in ESP ability. I am very sorry that Joe died before I realized this truth. He'd have gotten it, and enjoyed it. We were both right! Of course he got his data as negative and I got mine as positive.
Think about “double blind” testing of drugs that is used by drug manufacturers. Is it really “blind”. Cold logic says it is, but the above postulates (and actuality) say it isn't. At least one-third of all manufactured drugs on the market don't what they were designed for chemically, although they may be effective as placebo.
The “logical” scientific mind believes that if the doctor and the patient both are unaware (consciously) which is the drug, and which is the placebo, then the so-called “double blind” test is valid. They ignore the above and simply take the data as being correct. That data is definitely “compromised”. I've seen a lot of that since then, by biased doctors getting biased data and publishing it as “truth”. (Negative nutritional studies about vitamins C and E are prime examples of “biased” experiments - using “wrong” dosages is also a common example of ignorance and bias.)
As an interesting aside, when Joe first published his statistical results of his ESP experiments, his mathematics were questions and condemned by a large group of psychologists at a major convention. Months later, at a convention for mathematicians, it was resolved that:
They didn't believe the results either!
The psychologists were wrong about his statistical usage. That was absolutely correct mathematically!
That's scientific thinking? No, but it's typical of too many ignorant scientists who let their beliefs overcome facts.
Placebo Medicine
Another amazing “trick” of the unconscious is placebo effect. This is where a sugar (or other harmless) pill is given a patient. If the patient believes in the doctor, the sugar pill works as well as an actual drug. Of course, hypnosis also can work to remove pain, and to aid healing. If the unconscious mind believes, the patient gets well. If the unconscious mind believes that they are dying, they probably are. This is the almost frightening power of the unconscious.
In Orlando in the 1980's, there was one surgeon at one hospital whose record with patients was “different” from all other surgeons. His surgery patients took less painkillers; were ready to leave the hospital a day or so before other doctors patients; and were much less problem to nurses. What was his secret? (And, more importantly, why didn't all other MD's know and use it?)
After surgery, while the patient was in recovery, and still “dopey”, he went in to that room, sat down, held the patients hand, and said, “Don't worry, it was a very simple operation, no problems at all, and you're doing very well now. It was so easy that you'll need very little pain-killer, and you'll be out of here in no time.”
The patient believes, and it becomes so. This speech was the same, even though the actual surgery may have been the most difficult of his career. But, his little five-minute speech did as much good for recovery as his surgery.
Any doctor whose patient gets cured gets an ego boost and believes that he cured the patient, making him godlike. The truth is that no doctor EVER cures anybody. If he's good, makes the right decisions, he does HELP the patient to self-cure. The cure is done by the unconscious mind; the doctor only assists this “internal doctor”. As a doctor (PhD), I was helpful to many patients, and undoubtedly my help saved a few lives. I always tried to remind myself that the major credit belonged to the patient. I only assisted. (Too many doctors already think they're godlike.)
Few MD's realize that no patient is completely “out of it” by anesthetic. The conscious mind may be, but the unconscious mind never is. At a hypnosis seminar, many years ago, the speaker expressed this fact to the audience. At the murmurs of disbelief from some MD's, he asked for any volunteer in the audience who had had surgery. One MD came forward. He was hypnotized, and he was taken back in memory to that surgery. He then was asked to repeat all conversations or words spoken during his operation. He then did so, and the words were pretty typical of that type of operation. The MD's in the audience were stunned, as was he on awakening.
This leads us to the need for care in the operating room. A casual comment about the patient could have life threatening consequences. Let's look at a few sample negative comments that might even kill a patient.
“I don't think this guy will make it.”
“This woman is too fat to live”
“His heart is pretty bad”
“Her liver is shot”
Bill Cosby had a comedy routine where a doctor was operating on a patient. During the simple operation, the doctor said things like, “hemostat,. …frabulator….dismogle …OOPS!”. Of course, this scared the hell out of the patient, who said “What'd you say? You said OOPS! I know what OOPS means. Am I gonna die?”
Such negative comments might actually kill a patient. It's individual of course, but the effects of such negative comments can do as much harm to a patient as the good of those positive comments of the surgeon above. We tend to forget the power of the unconscious, and doctors shouldn't. Every word spoken in an operating room should be positive.
Positive Thinking and Visualization
There's an old psychological saying, “If you think you can't, you're right!”
Every top professional athlete knows the value of positive thinking. And, he also knows the effect of negative thinking. If a golfer thinks, “I've got to watch out for that bunker on the right”, he may very well slice his ball. The professional golfer just looks at the direction he wants the ball to go, ignoring the hazards, and visualizes that flight. That's the way to do it. In sports lingo, that's called “getting your mind out of the way”. Of course, this refers to the conscious mind. Your unconscious mind knows all the muscle movements needed for each task from the hours (years?) of practice. Stop thinking, and let the unconscious take over. That's the key to athletic success.
Everyone who has studied hypnosis knows that only positive self-statements and positive visualizations are effective. Such negative phrases as: “I won't eat as much”, puts the idea of eating into the mind. Substitute the phrase, “I feel full”, as a positive thought. That, at least has a chance to do what you want to do.
Article Source: http://www.ArticleJoe.com
Phil Bate PhD - Retired Orthomolecular Psychologist Inventor and Patent Pending Holder for Brain Wave Amplitude Changing via Auditory Training BateAudio.com Alternate-Health.com Retired Orthomolecular Psychologist - Inventor and patent holder of "Brain Wave Amplitude Change via Subliminal Training". full resume at: Subliminals-Training.com or at: Alternate-Health.com
